ТУРЕЦКАЯ АДАПТАЦИЯ ШКАЛЫ ОТНОШЕНИЯ К ЗДОРОВЬЮ: ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ НАДЕЖНОСТИ
Ключевые слова:
подход, отношение к здоровью, надежность, шкала, обоснованность
Аннотация
Цель. Целью данного исследования является адаптация шкалы отношения к здоровью, разработанной Л. Альфреем и соавторами, к турецкой культуре. Материалы и методы. Для адаптации шкалы отношения к здоровью в исследовании приняли участие 173 студента и 124 студентки университета. После перевода шкалы на турецкий язык был проведен первичный и вторичный факторный анализ полученных данных. Результаты. По результатам первичного факторного анализа было определено, что общая объясненная дисперсия составила 40,462 %, а факторные нагрузки варьировались от 0,38 до 0,69. По результатам вторичного анализа были зарегистрированы следующие статистические значения: χ2 / sd (2,018), GFI (0,932), CFI (0,96), AGFI (0,906), NFI (0,897), IFI (0,941), RMSEA (0,059). Заключение. Согласно результатам исследования, шкала отношения к здоровью признана действенным и надежным инструментом применительно к турецкой культуре.
Литература
1. Ali A., Katz D.L. Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: How Integrative Medicine Fits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 230–240.
2. Alpar R. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilim-lerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, 2014.
3. Atilla G., Büyüker İşler D.A. Qualitative PreStudy on Healthism as a Consumer Object. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 2012, no. 34, pp. 221–230.
4. Alfrey L., O’Connor J., Phillipson S. et al. Attitudes of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers to Healthism: Development and Validation of the Attitude Towards Healthism Scale (ATHS). European Physical Education Review, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 424–437. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X17742665
5. Brown T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New Jersey: Guil-ford Publications, 2006
6. Bryman A., Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 1o for Windows. London: Routledge, 2001. DOI: 10.4324/9780203459621
7. Büyüköztürk Ş. Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2016.
8. Clarke E.A. What is Preventive Medicine? Canadian Family Physician, 1974, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 65–68.
9. Crawford R. Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 365–388. DOI: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
10. Eggert R.W., Parkinson M.D. Preventive Medicine and Health System Reform: Improving Physician Education, Training, and Practice. JAMA, 1994, vol. 272, no. 9, pp. 688–693.
11. Evans B. 'Be Fit Not Fat': Broadening the Childhood Obesity Debate Beyond Dualisms'. Children's Geographies, 2004, no. 2.2, pp. 288–291.
12. Greenhalgh T., Wessely S. Health for Me: a Sociocultural Analysis of Healthism in the Middle Classes. British Medical Bulletin, 2004, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 197–213. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldh013
13. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60.
14. Jones M. Makeover Culture’s Dark Side: Breasts, Death and Lolo Ferrari. Body & Society, 2008, no. 14, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07087532
15. Kline R.B. Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4 ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2016.
16. Lee J., Macdonald D. ‘Are They Just Checking our Obesity or what?’The Healthism Discourse and Rural Young Women. Sport, Education and Society, 2010, no. 15.2, pp. 203–219. DOI: 10.1080/13573321003683851
17. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1996, vol. 1 (2), pp. 130–149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
18. Rysst M. “Healthism” and Looking Good: Body Ideals and Body Practices in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2010, vol. 38 (5 suppl.), pp. 71–80.
19. Wolf E.J., Harrington K.M., Clark S.L., Miller M.W. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Na-tional Institutes of Health, 2013, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 913–934. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237
20. Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for The Social Sciences (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association, 2002.
21. Turrini M. A Genealogy of “Healthism”. Ea – Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–27.
22. Wright J., Burrows L. “Being Healthy”: the Discursive Construction of Health in New Zealand Children's Responses to the National Education Monitoring Project. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2004, no. 25.2, pp. 211–230. DOI: 10.1080/01596300410001692157
2. Alpar R. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilim-lerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, 2014.
3. Atilla G., Büyüker İşler D.A. Qualitative PreStudy on Healthism as a Consumer Object. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 2012, no. 34, pp. 221–230.
4. Alfrey L., O’Connor J., Phillipson S. et al. Attitudes of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers to Healthism: Development and Validation of the Attitude Towards Healthism Scale (ATHS). European Physical Education Review, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 424–437. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X17742665
5. Brown T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New Jersey: Guil-ford Publications, 2006
6. Bryman A., Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 1o for Windows. London: Routledge, 2001. DOI: 10.4324/9780203459621
7. Büyüköztürk Ş. Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2016.
8. Clarke E.A. What is Preventive Medicine? Canadian Family Physician, 1974, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 65–68.
9. Crawford R. Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 365–388. DOI: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
10. Eggert R.W., Parkinson M.D. Preventive Medicine and Health System Reform: Improving Physician Education, Training, and Practice. JAMA, 1994, vol. 272, no. 9, pp. 688–693.
11. Evans B. 'Be Fit Not Fat': Broadening the Childhood Obesity Debate Beyond Dualisms'. Children's Geographies, 2004, no. 2.2, pp. 288–291.
12. Greenhalgh T., Wessely S. Health for Me: a Sociocultural Analysis of Healthism in the Middle Classes. British Medical Bulletin, 2004, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 197–213. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldh013
13. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60.
14. Jones M. Makeover Culture’s Dark Side: Breasts, Death and Lolo Ferrari. Body & Society, 2008, no. 14, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07087532
15. Kline R.B. Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4 ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2016.
16. Lee J., Macdonald D. ‘Are They Just Checking our Obesity or what?’The Healthism Discourse and Rural Young Women. Sport, Education and Society, 2010, no. 15.2, pp. 203–219. DOI: 10.1080/13573321003683851
17. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1996, vol. 1 (2), pp. 130–149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
18. Rysst M. “Healthism” and Looking Good: Body Ideals and Body Practices in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2010, vol. 38 (5 suppl.), pp. 71–80.
19. Wolf E.J., Harrington K.M., Clark S.L., Miller M.W. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Na-tional Institutes of Health, 2013, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 913–934. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237
20. Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for The Social Sciences (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association, 2002.
21. Turrini M. A Genealogy of “Healthism”. Ea – Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–27.
22. Wright J., Burrows L. “Being Healthy”: the Discursive Construction of Health in New Zealand Children's Responses to the National Education Monitoring Project. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2004, no. 25.2, pp. 211–230. DOI: 10.1080/01596300410001692157
2. Alpar R. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilim-lerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, 2014.
3. Atilla G., Büyüker İşler D.A. Qualitative PreStudy on Healthism as a Consumer Object. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 2012, no. 34, pp. 221–230.
4. Alfrey L., O’Connor J., Phillipson S. et al. Attitudes of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers to Healthism: Development and Validation of the Attitude Towards Healthism Scale (ATHS). European Physical Education Review, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 424–437. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X17742665
5. Brown T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New Jersey: Guil-ford Publications, 2006
6. Bryman A., Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 1o for Windows. London: Routledge, 2001. DOI: 10.4324/9780203459621
7. Büyüköztürk Ş. Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2016.
8. Clarke E.A. What is Preventive Medicine? Canadian Family Physician, 1974, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 65–68.
9. Crawford R. Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 365–388. DOI: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
10. Eggert R.W., Parkinson M.D. Preventive Medicine and Health System Reform: Improving Physician Education, Training, and Practice. JAMA, 1994, vol. 272, no. 9, pp. 688–693.
11. Evans B. 'Be Fit Not Fat': Broadening the Childhood Obesity Debate Beyond Dualisms'. Children's Geographies, 2004, no. 2.2, pp. 288–291.
12. Greenhalgh T., Wessely S. Health for Me: a Sociocultural Analysis of Healthism in the Middle Classes. British Medical Bulletin, 2004, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 197–213. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldh013
13. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60.
14. Jones M. Makeover Culture’s Dark Side: Breasts, Death and Lolo Ferrari. Body & Society, 2008, no. 14, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07087532
15. Kline R.B. Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4 ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2016.
16. Lee J., Macdonald D. ‘Are They Just Checking our Obesity or what?’The Healthism Discourse and Rural Young Women. Sport, Education and Society, 2010, no. 15.2, pp. 203–219. DOI: 10.1080/13573321003683851
17. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1996, vol. 1 (2), pp. 130–149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
18. Rysst M. “Healthism” and Looking Good: Body Ideals and Body Practices in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2010, vol. 38 (5 suppl.), pp. 71–80.
19. Wolf E.J., Harrington K.M., Clark S.L., Miller M.W. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Na-tional Institutes of Health, 2013, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 913–934. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237
20. Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for The Social Sciences (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association, 2002.
21. Turrini M. A Genealogy of “Healthism”. Ea – Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–27.
22. Wright J., Burrows L. “Being Healthy”: the Discursive Construction of Health in New Zealand Children's Responses to the National Education Monitoring Project. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2004, no. 25.2, pp. 211–230. DOI: 10.1080/01596300410001692157
References
1. Ali A., Katz D.L. Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: How Integrative Medicine Fits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 230–240.2. Alpar R. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilim-lerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, 2014.
3. Atilla G., Büyüker İşler D.A. Qualitative PreStudy on Healthism as a Consumer Object. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 2012, no. 34, pp. 221–230.
4. Alfrey L., O’Connor J., Phillipson S. et al. Attitudes of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers to Healthism: Development and Validation of the Attitude Towards Healthism Scale (ATHS). European Physical Education Review, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 424–437. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X17742665
5. Brown T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New Jersey: Guil-ford Publications, 2006
6. Bryman A., Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 1o for Windows. London: Routledge, 2001. DOI: 10.4324/9780203459621
7. Büyüköztürk Ş. Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2016.
8. Clarke E.A. What is Preventive Medicine? Canadian Family Physician, 1974, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 65–68.
9. Crawford R. Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 365–388. DOI: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
10. Eggert R.W., Parkinson M.D. Preventive Medicine and Health System Reform: Improving Physician Education, Training, and Practice. JAMA, 1994, vol. 272, no. 9, pp. 688–693.
11. Evans B. 'Be Fit Not Fat': Broadening the Childhood Obesity Debate Beyond Dualisms'. Children's Geographies, 2004, no. 2.2, pp. 288–291.
12. Greenhalgh T., Wessely S. Health for Me: a Sociocultural Analysis of Healthism in the Middle Classes. British Medical Bulletin, 2004, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 197–213. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldh013
13. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60.
14. Jones M. Makeover Culture’s Dark Side: Breasts, Death and Lolo Ferrari. Body & Society, 2008, no. 14, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X07087532
15. Kline R.B. Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4 ed.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2016.
16. Lee J., Macdonald D. ‘Are They Just Checking our Obesity or what?’The Healthism Discourse and Rural Young Women. Sport, Education and Society, 2010, no. 15.2, pp. 203–219. DOI: 10.1080/13573321003683851
17. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1996, vol. 1 (2), pp. 130–149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
18. Rysst M. “Healthism” and Looking Good: Body Ideals and Body Practices in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2010, vol. 38 (5 suppl.), pp. 71–80.
19. Wolf E.J., Harrington K.M., Clark S.L., Miller M.W. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Na-tional Institutes of Health, 2013, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 913–934. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237
20. Stevens J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for The Social Sciences (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association, 2002.
21. Turrini M. A Genealogy of “Healthism”. Ea – Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–27.
22. Wright J., Burrows L. “Being Healthy”: the Discursive Construction of Health in New Zealand Children's Responses to the National Education Monitoring Project. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2004, no. 25.2, pp. 211–230. DOI: 10.1080/01596300410001692157
Опубликован
2021-06-08
Как цитировать
Уграш, С., Озен, Г., Айкора, Э., & Юрдакул, Х. (2021). ТУРЕЦКАЯ АДАПТАЦИЯ ШКАЛЫ ОТНОШЕНИЯ К ЗДОРОВЬЮ: ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ НАДЕЖНОСТИ. Человек. Спорт. Медицина, 21(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm210115
Выпуск
Раздел
Спортивная тренировка
Copyright (c) 2021 Человек. Спорт. Медицина
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
