ПРОГНОЗИРОВАНИЕ ВЫПОЛНЕНИЯ 100 м КРОЛЕМ НА ГРУДИ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ АНТРОПОМЕТРИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК У МОЛОДЫХ ГРЕЧЕСКИХ ПЛОВЦОВ В ЗАВИСИМОСТИ ОТ ПОЛА
Ключевые слова:
молодые пловцы, антропометрия, 100 м кроль на груди
Аннотация
Цель. Целью данной статьи является выявление предсказательной способности взаимоотношений между выполнением 100 м кролем на груди и антропометрическими характеристиками молодых пловцов. Материалы и методы. Пятьдесят один действующий спортсмен (n = 30 – мужчины, n = 21 – женщины) принял участие в исследовании. С целью анализа спортсмены были разделены на две категории (13–15 лет n = 32, 16–18 лет, n = 19). В качестве предсказательных переменных были использованы следующие антропометрические данные: 7 переменных – параметров длины, 7 переменных – параметры кожных складок, 3 переменных – параметры обхвата, 1 переменная – показатель объема). Результаты. Разработана одна предсказательная модель для каждой из групп, выделенных по полу и возрасту. Процент объясненной дисперсии зависимой переменной (время выполнения 100 м кролем на груди) составляет 84,6%, 54,4%, 71,1% и 72,7% для мужчин, женщин, младшей и старшей возрастной групп соответственно. Значимыми переменными для каждой модели выступали: размах рук, кожная складка бицепса, обхват бицепса при сокращении мышц для мужчин-пловцов, рост сидя для женщин-пловцов, обхват бицепса при сокращении мышц и масса тела для пловцов младшей возрастной группы, кожная складка трицепса и обхват бицепса при сокращении мышц для пловцов старшей возрастной группы. Заключение. Результативность молодых пловцов можно предсказать по важным антропометрическим показателям.
Литература
1. Barbosa T.M., Costa M., Marinho D.A. et al. Modeling the Links Between Young Swimmers’ Performance: Energetics and Biomechanic Profiles. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 379–391. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.3.379
2. Bond D., Goodson L., Oxford S.W. et al. The Association Between Anthropometric Variables, Functional Movement Screen Scores and 100 m Freestyle Swimming Performance in Youth Swimmers. Sports, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/sports3010001
3. Brauer Junior A.G., Popov O.I., Boul-gakova N.J. Trajectory of Development of Morfofunctionals Pointers as Criteria of Identification of the Sports Talent in Swimming. Fitness & Performance Journal (online edition), 2007, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 382–387. DOI: 10.3900/fpj.6.6.382.e
4. Erlandson M.C., Sherar L.B., Mirwald R.L. et al. Growth and Maturation of Adolescent Female Gymnasts, Swimmers and Tennis Players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2008, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34–42. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181596678
5. Figueiredo P., Silva A., Sampaio A. et al. Front Crawl Sprint Performance: A Cluster Analysis of Biomechanics, Energetic, Coordinative, and Anthropometric Determinants in Young Swimmers. Motor Control, 2016. DOI: 1123/mc.2014–0050
6. Garrido N.D., Silva A.J., Fernandes R.J. et al. High Level Swimming Performance and Its Relation to Non-Specific Parameters: a Cross Sectional Study on Maximum Handgrip Isometric Strength. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2012, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 936–948. DOI: 10.2466/05.10.25.PMS.114.3.936-948
7. Geladas N.D., Nassis G.P., Pavlicevic S. Somatic and Physical Traits Affecting Sprint Swimming Performance in Young Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 139–144. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817862
8. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 5th ed. 1998.
9. Jendrysek M., Nowosielska-Swadźba D., Zwolińska D., Podstawski R. Body Composition of Young People Aged 17–18 Years, Practicing and Not Practicing Swimming, with the Use of the Bioelectrical Impedance Method. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2015, 11, рр. 67–71. DOI: 10.15561/18189172.2015.1110
10. Kjendlie P.L., Stallman R.K. World Book of Swimming: From Science to Perfor-mance. Moscow, Morphology and Swimming Performance, 2011.
11. Latt E., Jurimae J., Maestu J. et al. Physiological, Biomechanical and Anthropometrical Predictors of Sprint Swimming Performance in Adolescent Swimmers. Journal of Sports and Medicine, 2010, vol. 9, pp. 398–404.
12. Lee R.C., Wang Z., Heo M. et al. Total-Body Skeletal Muscle Mass: Development and Cross-Validation of Anthropometric Prediction Models. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 796–803. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796
13. Lohman T., Roche A., Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Manual. Champaing (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988.
14. Morais J.E., Silva A.J., Marinho D.A. et al. Modelling the Relationship Between Biomechanics and Performance of Young Swimmers. European Journal of Sport Science, 2016, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 661–668. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1149227
15. Moura dos Santos M.A., Barbosa M.L., Castro Melo W.V. et al. Estimate of Propulsive Force in Front Crawl Swimming in Young Athletes. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 115–120.
16. Nasirzade A., Ehsanbakhsh A., Ilbeygi S. et al. Relationship Between Sprint Perfor¬mance of Front Crawl Swimming and Muscle Fascicle Length in Young Swimmers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2014, vol. 13, pp. 550–556.
17. Reis V.M., Silva A.J., Carneiro A.L. et al. 100 m and 200 m Front Crawl Performance Prediction Based on Anthropometric and Physiological Measurement. International Sport Medicine Journal, 2012, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–38.
18. Riewald S., Rodeo S. Science if Swim-ming Faster. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2015.
19. Saavedra J.M., Escalante Y., Rodri-guez F.A. A Multivariate Analysis of Perfor-mance in Young Swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 135–151. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.1.135
20. Shepilov A.V., Nenasheva A.V., Isaev A.P. Ergospirometric Indices of Evaluation of Exercise Performance of Female Swimmers of Different Ages and Qualifications. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 2013, No. 3, p. 13.
21. Strzala M., Tyka A. Physical Endurance, Somatic Indices and Swimming Technique Parameters as Determinants of Front Crawl Swimming Speed at Short Distances in Young Swimmers. Medicina Sportiva, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10036-009-0016-3
22. Taxtalis T., Gourgoulis V., Koltsis H. et al. Relationship Between Selected Anthropometric Characteristics and Swimming Performance in Young Male and Female Swimmers. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 101–112.
23. Vitor F. de M., Bohme M.S. Performance of Young Male Swimmers in the 100meters Front Crawl. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 278–287. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.2.278
2. Bond D., Goodson L., Oxford S.W. et al. The Association Between Anthropometric Variables, Functional Movement Screen Scores and 100 m Freestyle Swimming Performance in Youth Swimmers. Sports, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/sports3010001
3. Brauer Junior A.G., Popov O.I., Boul-gakova N.J. Trajectory of Development of Morfofunctionals Pointers as Criteria of Identification of the Sports Talent in Swimming. Fitness & Performance Journal (online edition), 2007, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 382–387. DOI: 10.3900/fpj.6.6.382.e
4. Erlandson M.C., Sherar L.B., Mirwald R.L. et al. Growth and Maturation of Adolescent Female Gymnasts, Swimmers and Tennis Players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2008, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34–42. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181596678
5. Figueiredo P., Silva A., Sampaio A. et al. Front Crawl Sprint Performance: A Cluster Analysis of Biomechanics, Energetic, Coordinative, and Anthropometric Determinants in Young Swimmers. Motor Control, 2016. DOI: 1123/mc.2014–0050
6. Garrido N.D., Silva A.J., Fernandes R.J. et al. High Level Swimming Performance and Its Relation to Non-Specific Parameters: a Cross Sectional Study on Maximum Handgrip Isometric Strength. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2012, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 936–948. DOI: 10.2466/05.10.25.PMS.114.3.936-948
7. Geladas N.D., Nassis G.P., Pavlicevic S. Somatic and Physical Traits Affecting Sprint Swimming Performance in Young Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 139–144. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817862
8. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 5th ed. 1998.
9. Jendrysek M., Nowosielska-Swadźba D., Zwolińska D., Podstawski R. Body Composition of Young People Aged 17–18 Years, Practicing and Not Practicing Swimming, with the Use of the Bioelectrical Impedance Method. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2015, 11, рр. 67–71. DOI: 10.15561/18189172.2015.1110
10. Kjendlie P.L., Stallman R.K. World Book of Swimming: From Science to Perfor-mance. Moscow, Morphology and Swimming Performance, 2011.
11. Latt E., Jurimae J., Maestu J. et al. Physiological, Biomechanical and Anthropometrical Predictors of Sprint Swimming Performance in Adolescent Swimmers. Journal of Sports and Medicine, 2010, vol. 9, pp. 398–404.
12. Lee R.C., Wang Z., Heo M. et al. Total-Body Skeletal Muscle Mass: Development and Cross-Validation of Anthropometric Prediction Models. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 796–803. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796
13. Lohman T., Roche A., Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Manual. Champaing (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988.
14. Morais J.E., Silva A.J., Marinho D.A. et al. Modelling the Relationship Between Biomechanics and Performance of Young Swimmers. European Journal of Sport Science, 2016, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 661–668. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1149227
15. Moura dos Santos M.A., Barbosa M.L., Castro Melo W.V. et al. Estimate of Propulsive Force in Front Crawl Swimming in Young Athletes. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 115–120.
16. Nasirzade A., Ehsanbakhsh A., Ilbeygi S. et al. Relationship Between Sprint Perfor¬mance of Front Crawl Swimming and Muscle Fascicle Length in Young Swimmers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2014, vol. 13, pp. 550–556.
17. Reis V.M., Silva A.J., Carneiro A.L. et al. 100 m and 200 m Front Crawl Performance Prediction Based on Anthropometric and Physiological Measurement. International Sport Medicine Journal, 2012, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–38.
18. Riewald S., Rodeo S. Science if Swim-ming Faster. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2015.
19. Saavedra J.M., Escalante Y., Rodri-guez F.A. A Multivariate Analysis of Perfor-mance in Young Swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 135–151. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.1.135
20. Shepilov A.V., Nenasheva A.V., Isaev A.P. Ergospirometric Indices of Evaluation of Exercise Performance of Female Swimmers of Different Ages and Qualifications. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 2013, No. 3, p. 13.
21. Strzala M., Tyka A. Physical Endurance, Somatic Indices and Swimming Technique Parameters as Determinants of Front Crawl Swimming Speed at Short Distances in Young Swimmers. Medicina Sportiva, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10036-009-0016-3
22. Taxtalis T., Gourgoulis V., Koltsis H. et al. Relationship Between Selected Anthropometric Characteristics and Swimming Performance in Young Male and Female Swimmers. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 101–112.
23. Vitor F. de M., Bohme M.S. Performance of Young Male Swimmers in the 100meters Front Crawl. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 278–287. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.2.278
2. Bond D., Goodson L., Oxford S.W. et al. The Association Between Anthropometric Variables, Functional Movement Screen Scores and 100 m Freestyle Swimming Performance in Youth Swimmers. Sports, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/sports3010001
3. Brauer Junior A.G., Popov O.I., Boul-gakova N.J. Trajectory of Development of Morfofunctionals Pointers as Criteria of Identification of the Sports Talent in Swimming. Fitness & Performance Journal (online edition), 2007, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 382–387. DOI: 10.3900/fpj.6.6.382.e
4. Erlandson M.C., Sherar L.B., Mirwald R.L. et al. Growth and Maturation of Adolescent Female Gymnasts, Swimmers and Tennis Players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2008, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34–42. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181596678
5. Figueiredo P., Silva A., Sampaio A. et al. Front Crawl Sprint Performance: A Cluster Analysis of Biomechanics, Energetic, Coordinative, and Anthropometric Determinants in Young Swimmers. Motor Control, 2016. DOI: 1123/mc.2014–0050
6. Garrido N.D., Silva A.J., Fernandes R.J. et al. High Level Swimming Performance and Its Relation to Non-Specific Parameters: a Cross Sectional Study on Maximum Handgrip Isometric Strength. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2012, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 936–948. DOI: 10.2466/05.10.25.PMS.114.3.936-948
7. Geladas N.D., Nassis G.P., Pavlicevic S. Somatic and Physical Traits Affecting Sprint Swimming Performance in Young Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 139–144. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817862
8. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 5th ed. 1998.
9. Jendrysek M., Nowosielska-Swadźba D., Zwolińska D., Podstawski R. Body Composition of Young People Aged 17–18 Years, Practicing and Not Practicing Swimming, with the Use of the Bioelectrical Impedance Method. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2015, 11, рр. 67–71. DOI: 10.15561/18189172.2015.1110
10. Kjendlie P.L., Stallman R.K. World Book of Swimming: From Science to Perfor-mance. Moscow, Morphology and Swimming Performance, 2011.
11. Latt E., Jurimae J., Maestu J. et al. Physiological, Biomechanical and Anthropometrical Predictors of Sprint Swimming Performance in Adolescent Swimmers. Journal of Sports and Medicine, 2010, vol. 9, pp. 398–404.
12. Lee R.C., Wang Z., Heo M. et al. Total-Body Skeletal Muscle Mass: Development and Cross-Validation of Anthropometric Prediction Models. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 796–803. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796
13. Lohman T., Roche A., Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Manual. Champaing (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988.
14. Morais J.E., Silva A.J., Marinho D.A. et al. Modelling the Relationship Between Biomechanics and Performance of Young Swimmers. European Journal of Sport Science, 2016, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 661–668. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1149227
15. Moura dos Santos M.A., Barbosa M.L., Castro Melo W.V. et al. Estimate of Propulsive Force in Front Crawl Swimming in Young Athletes. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 115–120.
16. Nasirzade A., Ehsanbakhsh A., Ilbeygi S. et al. Relationship Between Sprint Perfor¬mance of Front Crawl Swimming and Muscle Fascicle Length in Young Swimmers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2014, vol. 13, pp. 550–556.
17. Reis V.M., Silva A.J., Carneiro A.L. et al. 100 m and 200 m Front Crawl Performance Prediction Based on Anthropometric and Physiological Measurement. International Sport Medicine Journal, 2012, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–38.
18. Riewald S., Rodeo S. Science if Swim-ming Faster. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2015.
19. Saavedra J.M., Escalante Y., Rodri-guez F.A. A Multivariate Analysis of Perfor-mance in Young Swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 135–151. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.1.135
20. Shepilov A.V., Nenasheva A.V., Isaev A.P. Ergospirometric Indices of Evaluation of Exercise Performance of Female Swimmers of Different Ages and Qualifications. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 2013, No. 3, p. 13.
21. Strzala M., Tyka A. Physical Endurance, Somatic Indices and Swimming Technique Parameters as Determinants of Front Crawl Swimming Speed at Short Distances in Young Swimmers. Medicina Sportiva, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10036-009-0016-3
22. Taxtalis T., Gourgoulis V., Koltsis H. et al. Relationship Between Selected Anthropometric Characteristics and Swimming Performance in Young Male and Female Swimmers. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 101–112.
23. Vitor F. de M., Bohme M.S. Performance of Young Male Swimmers in the 100meters Front Crawl. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 278–287. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.2.278
References
1. Barbosa T.M., Costa M., Marinho D.A. et al. Modeling the Links Between Young Swimmers’ Performance: Energetics and Biomechanic Profiles. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 379–391. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.3.3792. Bond D., Goodson L., Oxford S.W. et al. The Association Between Anthropometric Variables, Functional Movement Screen Scores and 100 m Freestyle Swimming Performance in Youth Swimmers. Sports, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/sports3010001
3. Brauer Junior A.G., Popov O.I., Boul-gakova N.J. Trajectory of Development of Morfofunctionals Pointers as Criteria of Identification of the Sports Talent in Swimming. Fitness & Performance Journal (online edition), 2007, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 382–387. DOI: 10.3900/fpj.6.6.382.e
4. Erlandson M.C., Sherar L.B., Mirwald R.L. et al. Growth and Maturation of Adolescent Female Gymnasts, Swimmers and Tennis Players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2008, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34–42. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181596678
5. Figueiredo P., Silva A., Sampaio A. et al. Front Crawl Sprint Performance: A Cluster Analysis of Biomechanics, Energetic, Coordinative, and Anthropometric Determinants in Young Swimmers. Motor Control, 2016. DOI: 1123/mc.2014–0050
6. Garrido N.D., Silva A.J., Fernandes R.J. et al. High Level Swimming Performance and Its Relation to Non-Specific Parameters: a Cross Sectional Study on Maximum Handgrip Isometric Strength. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2012, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 936–948. DOI: 10.2466/05.10.25.PMS.114.3.936-948
7. Geladas N.D., Nassis G.P., Pavlicevic S. Somatic and Physical Traits Affecting Sprint Swimming Performance in Young Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 139–144. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817862
8. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 5th ed. 1998.
9. Jendrysek M., Nowosielska-Swadźba D., Zwolińska D., Podstawski R. Body Composition of Young People Aged 17–18 Years, Practicing and Not Practicing Swimming, with the Use of the Bioelectrical Impedance Method. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2015, 11, рр. 67–71. DOI: 10.15561/18189172.2015.1110
10. Kjendlie P.L., Stallman R.K. World Book of Swimming: From Science to Perfor-mance. Moscow, Morphology and Swimming Performance, 2011.
11. Latt E., Jurimae J., Maestu J. et al. Physiological, Biomechanical and Anthropometrical Predictors of Sprint Swimming Performance in Adolescent Swimmers. Journal of Sports and Medicine, 2010, vol. 9, pp. 398–404.
12. Lee R.C., Wang Z., Heo M. et al. Total-Body Skeletal Muscle Mass: Development and Cross-Validation of Anthropometric Prediction Models. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 796–803. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796
13. Lohman T., Roche A., Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Manual. Champaing (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988.
14. Morais J.E., Silva A.J., Marinho D.A. et al. Modelling the Relationship Between Biomechanics and Performance of Young Swimmers. European Journal of Sport Science, 2016, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 661–668. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1149227
15. Moura dos Santos M.A., Barbosa M.L., Castro Melo W.V. et al. Estimate of Propulsive Force in Front Crawl Swimming in Young Athletes. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 115–120.
16. Nasirzade A., Ehsanbakhsh A., Ilbeygi S. et al. Relationship Between Sprint Perfor¬mance of Front Crawl Swimming and Muscle Fascicle Length in Young Swimmers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2014, vol. 13, pp. 550–556.
17. Reis V.M., Silva A.J., Carneiro A.L. et al. 100 m and 200 m Front Crawl Performance Prediction Based on Anthropometric and Physiological Measurement. International Sport Medicine Journal, 2012, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–38.
18. Riewald S., Rodeo S. Science if Swim-ming Faster. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2015.
19. Saavedra J.M., Escalante Y., Rodri-guez F.A. A Multivariate Analysis of Perfor-mance in Young Swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 135–151. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.1.135
20. Shepilov A.V., Nenasheva A.V., Isaev A.P. Ergospirometric Indices of Evaluation of Exercise Performance of Female Swimmers of Different Ages and Qualifications. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 2013, No. 3, p. 13.
21. Strzala M., Tyka A. Physical Endurance, Somatic Indices and Swimming Technique Parameters as Determinants of Front Crawl Swimming Speed at Short Distances in Young Swimmers. Medicina Sportiva, 2009, vol. 13, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10036-009-0016-3
22. Taxtalis T., Gourgoulis V., Koltsis H. et al. Relationship Between Selected Anthropometric Characteristics and Swimming Performance in Young Male and Female Swimmers. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 101–112.
23. Vitor F. de M., Bohme M.S. Performance of Young Male Swimmers in the 100meters Front Crawl. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 278–287. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.2.278
Опубликован
2019-05-24
Как цитировать
Рози, Д., Допсай, М., & Платану, Т. (2019). ПРОГНОЗИРОВАНИЕ ВЫПОЛНЕНИЯ 100 м КРОЛЕМ НА ГРУДИ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ АНТРОПОМЕТРИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК У МОЛОДЫХ ГРЕЧЕСКИХ ПЛОВЦОВ В ЗАВИСИМОСТИ ОТ ПОЛА. Человек. Спорт. Медицина, 19(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm190108
Выпуск
Раздел
Спортивная тренировка
Copyright (c) 2019 Человек. Спорт. Медицина
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
