DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED MANIFESTATION FORMS DURING PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES AT UNIVERSITY

Talaghir L.; Mocanu G.; Iconomescu T.; Mindrescu V.

doi:10.14529/hsm180414

L. Talaghir “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Galati, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-9192 gtalaghir@ugal.ro
G. Mocanu “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Galati, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-4700 gmocanu@ugal.ro
T. Iconomescu “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Galati, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-4403 ticonomescu@ugal.ro
V. Mindrescu Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-6206 veronica_mindrescu@yahoo.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm180414

Keywords: PE classes at university, reaction time and repetition speed, motor skills, acceleration capacity, intense effort

Abstract

Aim. The aim of our research was to elaborate and assess the method for the development of speed as a motor skill applied in the experimental study with the mention that all the methods can be reunited in the form of the repetition method with four related procedures. Materials and methods. The experimental study took place during the academic year 2016/2017 and was carried out in groups of students-volunteers from faculties within Lower Danube University of Galati. The study implied 56 hours for the development and assessment of speed as a motor skill. Results. The tests used allowed us to assess all the important forms of speed manifestation and their combinations with other motor skills. The obtained results and statistical calculations demonstrated viability and effectiveness of our experimental curriculum. The correlative analysis highlighted the connections that exist between the different forms of speed manifestation, but also the differences that occur depending on sex and other characteristics of each analyzed group. Conclusion. The results obtained allow us to assess objectively the level of speed manifestation in students, but they are also a wake-up call regarding students’ deficiency in physical training and anaerobic effort capacity, specific to the intense actions that characterize the development and manifestation of this skill, which is extremely difficult to improve.

References

1. Andrei M.H., Hastie P. [Sport Education in a Higher Education Physical Activity Course]. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2017, iss. 3, no. 6, pp. 22–34.
2. Berhanu T.G. [Comparative Study of Physical Fitness Components between Physical and Non-Physical Education Male Students in Nekemte College of Teacher Education]. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2017, iss. 7, no. 6, pp. 35–43.
3. Bompa T.O. [The Development of Bio Motor Abilities]. Bucure?ti, Ex Ponto Publ., 2001, pp. 213–248.
4. Bota A. [Kinesiology]. Bucuresti, Didacticasi Pedagogica Publ., 2007, pp. 318–321.
5. Garciaa G.C., Secchib J.D., Arcuric C.R., [Relationship Between the Final Speed Reached the UMTT and UNCa Test in Male Subjects]. Apunts. Medicina de l'Esport, 2016, iss. 51, no. 190, pp. 37–71.
6. McCormick B.T., Hannon J.C., Hickslittle C.A., Newton M., Shultz B., Detling N., Young W.B. [The Relationship between Change of Direction Speed in the Frontal Plane, Power, Reactive Strength, and Strength]. International Journal of Exercise Science, 2014, iss. 7, no. 4, pp. 260–270.
7. Niculescu I.I. Motor, Somatic and Functional Assessment. Craiova, Universitaria Publ., 2006. 189 p.
8. Popovic R., Aleksic A., Stojanovic D., Stefanovic M., Bozic S., Popovic M. [Evaluation of the Physical Fitness Level in Physical Education Female Students Using “Eurofit-Test”]. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 2017, iss. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
9. Prieske O., Kruger T., Aehle M., Bauer E., Granacher U. [Effects of Resisted Sprint Training and Traditional Power Training on Sprint, Jump, and Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2018, iss. 9, p. 156.
10. Rata G. The didactics of physical education and sport, Iasi, Pim Publ., 2008, pp. 113–118.
11. Rata G., Rata B.C. Abilities in motor activity. Bacau, Edusoft Publ., 2006, pp. 119–168.
12. Rodriguez C., Ospina J., Piedra J. [Athletic Body Stereotypes in the Academic Training of Students in the Physical Activity and Sport Sciences]. J. Hum. Sport Exerc., 2016, iss. 11, no. 1, pp. 74–88.
13. Sanjit M., Bidya R., Gopal C.S. [Comparative Study of Speed and Agility Between University Level Cricket and Football Player]. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 2017, iss. 2, no. 1, pp. 386–388.
14. Schache A.G., Dorn T.W., Williams G.P., Brown N.A.T., Pandy M.G. [Lower-Limb Muscular Strategies for Increasing Running Speed]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 2014, iss. 44, no. 10, pp. 813–824.
15. Simion G., Amzar L. The science of human movement research. Pitesti Universitatea Publ., 2009, pp. 221–236.
16. Sobolewski E., Thompson B., Conchola E., Ryan E. [Development and Examination of a Functional Reactive Agility Test for Older Adults]. Aging Clin Exp Res., 2018, iss. 30, no. 4, pp. 293–298.
17. Stan Z. Motor and Functional Assessment. Galati, Zigotto Publ., 2009, pp. 146–150.
18. Sumanta M., Samir H., Sujit S. [A Comparative Study of Selected Motor Fitness Component between Soccer Players and B.P. Ed Students]. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 2016, iss. 3, no. 4, pp. 42–44.
19. Wagner M.C., Oden G.L., Glave A.P., William V. [Hyman,Development of agility utilising a multidimensional modality of plyometrics]. Journal of Fitness Research., 2014, iss. 3, no. 3, pp. 49–59.
20. Yarmak O., Blagii O., Palichuk Y., Hakman A., Balatska L., Moroz O., Galan Y. [Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Physical Condition of Girls 17–19 Year-Old]. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2018, iss. 13, no. 2, pp. 259–268.

References on translit

1. Andrei M.H., Hastie P. [Sport Education in a Higher Education Physical Activity Course]. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2017, iss. 3, no. 6, pp. 22–34.
2. Berhanu T.G. [Comparative Study of Physical Fitness Components between Physical and Non-Physical Education Male Students in Nekemte College of Teacher Education]. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2017, iss. 7, no. 6, pp. 35–43.
3. Bompa T.O. [The Development of Bio Motor Abilities]. Bucure?ti, Ex Ponto Publ., 2001, pp. 213–248.
4. Bota A. [Kinesiology]. Bucuresti, Didacticasi Pedagogica Publ., 2007, pp. 318–321.
5. Garciaa G.C., Secchib J.D., Arcuric C.R., [Relationship Between the Final Speed Reached the UMTT and UNCa Test in Male Subjects]. Apunts. Medicina de l'Esport, 2016, iss. 51, no. 190, pp. 37–71.
6. McCormick B.T., Hannon J.C., Hickslittle C.A., Newton M., Shultz B., Detling N., Young W.B. [The Relationship between Change of Direction Speed in the Frontal Plane, Power, Reactive Strength, and Strength]. International Journal of Exercise Science, 2014, iss. 7, no. 4, pp. 260–270.
7. Niculescu I.I. Motor, Somatic and Functional Assessment. Craiova, Universitaria Publ., 2006. 189 p.
8. Popovic R., Aleksic A., Stojanovic D., Stefanovic M., Bozic S., Popovic M. [Evaluation of the Physical Fitness Level in Physical Education Female Students Using “Eurofit-Test”]. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 2017, iss. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
9. Prieske O., Kruger T., Aehle M., Bauer E., Granacher U. [Effects of Resisted Sprint Training and Traditional Power Training on Sprint, Jump, and Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2018, iss. 9, p. 156.
10. Rata G. The didactics of physical education and sport, Iasi, Pim Publ., 2008, pp. 113–118.
11. Rata G., Rata B.C. Abilities in motor activity. Bacau, Edusoft Publ., 2006, pp. 119–168.
12. Rodriguez C., Ospina J., Piedra J. [Athletic Body Stereotypes in the Academic Training of Students in the Physical Activity and Sport Sciences]. J. Hum. Sport Exerc., 2016, iss. 11, no. 1, pp. 74–88.
13. Sanjit M., Bidya R., Gopal C.S. [Comparative Study of Speed and Agility Between University Level Cricket and Football Player]. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 2017, iss. 2, no. 1, pp. 386–388.
14. Schache A.G., Dorn T.W., Williams G.P., Brown N.A.T., Pandy M.G. [Lower-Limb Muscular Strategies for Increasing Running Speed]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 2014, iss. 44, no. 10, pp. 813–824.
15. Simion G., Amzar L. The science of human movement research. Pitesti Universitatea Publ., 2009, pp. 221–236.
16. Sobolewski E., Thompson B., Conchola E., Ryan E. [Development and Examination of a Functional Reactive Agility Test for Older Adults]. Aging Clin Exp Res., 2018, iss. 30, no. 4, pp. 293–298.
17. Stan Z. Motor and Functional Assessment. Galati, Zigotto Publ., 2009, pp. 146–150.
18. Sumanta M., Samir H., Sujit S. [A Comparative Study of Selected Motor Fitness Component between Soccer Players and B.P. Ed Students]. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 2016, iss. 3, no. 4, pp. 42–44.
19. Wagner M.C., Oden G.L., Glave A.P., William V. [Hyman,Development of agility utilising a multidimensional modality of plyometrics]. Journal of Fitness Research., 2014, iss. 3, no. 3, pp. 49–59.
20. Yarmak O., Blagii O., Palichuk Y., Hakman A., Balatska L., Moroz O., Galan Y. [Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Physical Condition of Girls 17–19 Year-Old]. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2018, iss. 13, no. 2, pp. 259–268.