ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL  AND MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS OF LONG-DISTANCE RUNNING

Grigoriev V.; Sharonova A.; Mironova O.; Yarchikovskaya L.; Kiprushina I.

doi:10.14529/hsm250109

V. Grigoriev Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-238X gr-finec2010@yandex.ru
A. Sharonova Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Russian State Hydrometeorological University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-2596 sasha_vgafk@mail.ru
O. Mironova Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7055-4944 mironova.olga2014@gmail.com
L. Yarchikovskaya Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-8544 ludayarchi9913@mail.ru
I. Kiprushina Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Herzen University, Saint Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-6096 ikipr57@mail.ru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm250109

Keywords: athletes, running, physiological functions, motor functions, energy supply

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to identify the relationship between physiological and motor characteristics of long-distance running and athletic performance. Material and methods. The study involved 20 students specializing in track and field athletics and competing in long-distance running. Participants were divided into two groups based on their performance levels: Group A (n = 10) consisted of athletes with a second adult category ranking, Group B (n = 10) included athletes with a first adult category ranking or higher. Running tests were conducted on a treadmill, during which a comprehensive set of cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and motor parameters was recorded. Long-distance running requires mobilization of physiological systems. Results. The results demonstrated that the parameters measured during a 3000-meter run test were proportional to those obtained during treadmill testing. The results indicate the importance of developing the capacity of both energy systems. A trend toward restructuring external respiration was observed, marked by an increase in both respiratory rate and depth. However, maximal oxygen utilization and carbon dioxide excretion remained relatively stable. Conclusion. The study established that improvements in most of the examined physiological indicators reflect enhanced functional capabilities among the participants. As training levels increased, the energy cost of running decreased, and the ratio between aerobic and anaerobic energy supply shifted toward a greater contribution from the anaerobic component.

Author Biographies

V. Grigoriev , Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Departments of Physical Education, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

A. Sharonova , Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Russian State Hydrometeorological University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education and Life Safety, Russian State Hydrometeorological University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education and Sports, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

O. Mironova , Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education and Sports, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

L. Yarchikovskaya , Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education and Sports, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

I. Kiprushina , Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Herzen University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Education, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Associate Professor, Department of Theory and Organization of Physical Culture, Herzen University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

References

References on translit